Evaluate

/impeccable audit

Five-dimension technical quality check with P0 to P3 severity.

/impeccable audit the checkout flow
src/checkout/**
2.6 / 4
Accessibility 2 / 4
Performance 3 / 4
Theming 2.5 / 4
Responsive 3 / 4
Anti-patterns 2.8 / 4
P02 P15 P28 P314

Five dimensions scored 0 to 4, each finding tagged P0 (blocks release) to P3 (polish). Audit documents; it doesn't fix. Route the findings into /impeccable harden, /impeccable polish, or /impeccable optimize.

When to use it

/impeccable audit is the technical counterpart to /impeccable critique. Where /impeccable critique asks “does this feel right”, /impeccable audit asks “does this hold up”. It runs accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-pattern checks against the implementation, scores each dimension 0 to 4, and produces a plan with P0 to P3 severity ratings.

Use it before shipping, during a quality sprint, or whenever a tech lead says “we should really look at accessibility”.

How it works

The skill scans your code across five dimensions:

  1. Accessibility: WCAG contrast, ARIA, keyboard nav, semantic HTML, form labels.
  2. Performance: layout thrashing, expensive animations, missing lazy loading, bundle weight.
  3. Theming: hard-coded colors, dark mode coverage, token consistency.
  4. Responsive: breakpoint behavior, touch targets, mobile viewport handling.
  5. Anti-patterns: the same deterministic 25 checks the detector runs.

Each dimension gets a 0 to 4 score. Each finding gets a severity: P0 blocks the release, P1 should fix this sprint, P2 is next cycle, P3 is polish. You get back a single document you can paste into a ticket tracker.

Audit does not fix anything. It documents. Route the findings to /impeccable polish, /impeccable harden, or /impeccable optimize depending on the category.

Try it

/impeccable audit the checkout flow

Expected output:

Accessibility: 2/4 (partial)
  P0: Missing form labels on 4 inputs
  P1: Contrast 3.1:1 on disabled button state
  P2: No visible focus indicator on custom dropdown

Performance: 3/4 (good)
  P1: Hero image not lazy-loaded (340KB)
  ...

Hand the P0s to /impeccable harden, the theming and typography P1s to /impeccable typeset and /impeccable polish, the rest to /impeccable polish.

Pitfalls

  • Confusing it with /impeccable critique. Audit is implementation quality. Critique is design quality. Run both for a full picture.
  • Fixing P3s before P0s. The severity scale exists for a reason. Start at the top.
  • Skipping the dimensions you think are fine. Theming and responsive are the ones most people assume are fine until they are not.